I saw
Argo yesterday at the Cobblehill Theater in Brooklyn with my friend
Hai-Dang Phan. It’s a well-made, entertaining thriller, but especially
interesting to me for the way it displays so clearly the way people in the U.S.
understand their history as a deferred wish-fulfillment. (Btw, Argo,
fuck yourself! is a running joke in the film. Alan Arkin, the producer
says it to a reporter asking what the film is about.) The ending of the film is
the worst part but also the most interesting. Spoiler alert.
Affleck’s character, who is separated from his wife and a very heavy drinker,
if not an alcoholic, comes home and asks his wife if he can “come
in.” She hugs him and says nothing, but she is smiling and all
happy, happy. The first shot of Affleck on the veranda shows a big
American flag blowing in the upper left part of the screen. Male
hero equals national hero. The family is restored. But not
really. The next shot is of Affleck in bed with his son, who is sleeping
in Affleck’s arms, but totally awake, and the camera tracks left to show part
of the son’s star wars collection of action figures or figurines. They are
pretty small scale. There are at least three dissolves to close-ups of
the collection, each take feeling extraordinarily long, at least to me, until
finally we get to a storyboard for the bogus film that we saw Affleck keep back
from the archivist earlier (Affleck was supposed to turn over all the other
docs and did so, except for this one). The storyboard, around which text about what happened later, shows the hero on some kind of space motorbike with a little
boy holding on to him. Mirror image of Affleck and his son. Two
points about the film's delivery of U.S. history as yet to be fulfilled
fantasy: first, the family is not really restored. The wife is
hardly there and immediately drops out. The son is safe and asleep, but
Dad is still on duty, his heroism invisible (what he did remains classified).
Second, national history is only intelligible indirectly, through the sci-fi
movie. History begins returns only through science-fiction fantasy. The Star
Wars shots recycle the film as Reagan’s never built anti-ballistic missile
defense system, called Star Wars. The length of the takes at the end
grant the wish or family reunion only through deferral which looks forward to Star
Wars in a future anterior, since the film has already been released but
Reagan has not yet been elected, and back via the stolen storyboard, to the
sci-fi film Argo that one of the hostages used to get himself and the other
five hostages through the final checkpoint, which was itself a story of he
Iranian revolution, and back to the moment when Affleck got the idea for the op
while watching Battle for the Planet of the Apes on TV with his
son. The son is father of the man.
Son is watching it at his home, Mom is gone, and Affleck turns the
channel in his hotel room so he can watch it too at the same time. The
clips from Battle the Planet of the Apes show the black astronaut with
two apes and ends with a close up of an orangantan. That film is openly
an allegory of the race wars of the 60s and recycles racist images of blacks
represented as apes. (Think King Kong.) Affleck notices the
make-up and gets the idea to call the guy who did it, who has also done work
for the C.I.A. There are lots of clips of TV news anchors (Peter
Jennings, Walter Chronkite, Ted Koppel) reporting on the hostage crisis, but
Affleck only gets it, the rescue op, when he tunes into his son’s channel. And he only pursues it after calling his son
and missing him (shot of phone, no one home). So he writes a birthday card to
his son and wife and drops in the mail at the airport. Communication delay, letter never arrives at its destination. The film begins with a sequence about the US
involvement in Iran that derives from Persepolis. It is narrated by a
girl in voice-over as a kind of animated graphic novel (anticipating the Argo storyboards later and also echoing in advance an Iranian servant of the Canadian ambassador who is forced to leave to Iraq near the end of the film). From start to finish, we get history delivered in
pre-production movie form or animated storybook form or in collectible sci-fi
film merchandise. This sequence is refreshingly critical of the
U.S. it sort of drops out as the Argo fantasy recodes it as a story of
miniature American and Canadian triumphalism (the rest of the hostages remained
in captivity, of course). So the scale of the story is the scale of the
toys in the son’s Star Wars toy collection, and the son’s collection forgets
the history of U.S. race war and remembers what is to come rather than what has
happened. The re-collection is already compulsive, looping back and
forward a moment when the wish can actually be fulfilled, a moment that
never arrives and never will, or does so only as a moment represented as the
deferral of said wish. Every covert op is part
of a lo-“op.” No op is opt(imal).
Friday, October 26, 2012
Friday, October 12, 2012
Til Death Do Us Depart: Cold Feet in Trollope's _Can You Forgive Her?_
Can you be happy as a woman and not marry? That is the question Trollope poses in Can You Forgive Her? The answer is no. Yes, Alice knows John Grey loves. Yes, she knows he loves her. But nevertheless she cannot marry him. Why? In part because because she misreads him. But this novel is no Pride and Prejudice. A woman can't marry and be happy either. This novel is about marriage being death. Here is what the narrator says about Planty Pall, Gencora's husband, after he has decided to refuse the once in a lifetime offer he has sought his entire adulthood trying to obtain, namely the office of he Chancellor of the Exchequer, in order to save his marriage by taking his wife on a tour of Europe for a year: "All
his friends knew, or believed they knew, that he had left town. His death and burial had been chronicled, and
were he now to reappear, he could
reappear only as a ghost. He was being talked of as the departed one;--or
rather, such talk on all sides had now come nearly to an end." p. 561 Glencora wants to leave her husband because she cannot give him an heir. When John Grey finally gets Alice to accept his proposal, she does so in a graveyard. In my view of the novel, a woman who doesn't marry, like a woman who does, already has one foot in the grave. The central scene of the novel occurs when Alice go for a walk in the ruins near Matching, her home, and Glencora keeps them out to long. They come home with cold feet, and Planty blames Alice. The scene is mentioned again and again in the novel, even near the very end. "Cold" iS used again and again. Planty gives Glencora a "cold kiss." A dead husband is buried in the "cold sod." Funny when you think of it. Trollope's The Warden is missing its second volume. The heroine who gets married in a narrative rush at the end is already a widow at the beginning of Barchester Towers. The story of their seemingly happy marriage is never told. Trollope seems to be even more anti-marriage than Hardy. Who'd have thought?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)